Our Moon is a potential indicator of a possible alien presence near the Earth at some time during the past 4 billion years. NASA may well be a civilian agency, but many of its programs are funded by the defence budget and most of the astronauts are subject to military security regulations. Apart from the fact that the National Security Agency screens all films and probably radio communications as well, what can we make of the data that is available to the public via images returned from lunar missions? As with images returned from Mars, the lunar image archive is fairly expansive, we have thousands of images that have been catalogued and archived, safely stored away in repositories around America. Unfortunately only a relative handful of images are available to the general public from these thousands of images brought and paid for by tax dollars.

More and more independent investigators, are reaching the conclusion, based on thousands of hours of hard research that the Moon at some distant period in time was used as a kind of terminal station, between Mars and the earth, during mass relocation activities (to what has become our world) as the climate on Mars deteriorated. These suggestions are partially confirmed by legends and myths that speak of a race of gods in ancient times ,that are cited by many different nations and cultures from around our planet. Ruins of lunar cities stretching along many kilometres, huge transparent domes on massive basements, numerous tunnels and other constructions such as the shattered and fragmented ruins noted by Richard Hoagland, along with examples of artefacts and partially destroyed objects on the lunar surface can’t be placed among natural geological formations, as they are of complex organization and geometrical structure. of particular note are artefacts located on and around lunar module landing sites and captured in orbital photography. Investigators are especially interested in ancient structures resembling partially destroyed cities. Orbital photography reveals an astonishingly regular geometry of square and rectangular constructions. They resemble our terrestrial cities seen from the height of 5-8 kilometres but as is the case with Mars ,these mega structures are many times terrestrial scale. One of the theories mankind is trying to solve is the very origin of the Moon itself. A detailed comparison of the properties of Lunar and Earth rock samples has placed very strong constraints on the possible validity of the hypotheses that the moon was ripped from the earth at the time of planetary formation in the solar system. For example, if the Moon came from material that once made up the Earth, then Lunar and Terrestrial rocks should be much more similar in composition than if the Moon was formed somewhere else and only later was captured by the Earth. These analyses indicate that the abundances of elements in Lunar and Terrestrial material are sufficiently different to make it unlikely that the Moon formed directly from the Earth. This theory is called the “Capture Theory“. It states that the Moon’s original orbit brought it close enough to the Earth’s gravitational field, thereby causing this gravitational field to “capture“ the Moon. Some even take the stance that the moon was physically manoeuvred into its' current position.
So what can we make of all that we have learned over the last few decades?
If one were to stand at some distance away from the arguments that have ensued, one can clearly discern two camps milling around what we would call the truth. The truth can be defined simply as "what actually is" ,the problems begin when we ask ourselves how do we get to a place that can allow us to learn "what actually is" from "what is not",this brings us to the examination of details. The problem with examining in fine detail is that nine times out of ten a "detail" can take on the appearance of an onion and becomes such a many layered thing, that the original question becomes lost to other questions.
In the case of structures on the moon or Mars, we may look at what is clearly a geometrical form laying in an area of random chaos geology and conclude, that it is a synthetic form placed in a deliberate fashion, be that stone placed upon stone or fabricated glass and metallic beams, or indeed some other form of artefact, that is out of place in the area and its natural surrounds.
Now when a scientists examines this image in detail he will also note that this item is on the moon, which has no atmosphere, no water, and has only been visited by humans a few times in rather short time spans. If he hasn't already thrown out the idea that this image may contain some kind of out of place artefact he will begin to study what we "know" about the moon, written by other scientists, examining different aspects of lunar science. If this doesn't throw him off, he may look at a potential terrestrial origin for the lunar artefact, concluding that
humans ,never were advanced enough to have placed the artefact on the moon themselves in ancient times. If he is still interested, he may reference statistical odds of any alien species existing somewhere in the universe that may travel great distances in order to place this artefact on the moon(such as in Drakes numbers).There in, the onion forms around our search for truth, and in doing so the truth is actually missed and the artefact is forgotten or dismissed.

So what is the truth?
The truth is that Mars was once earth like.
The truth is that we have images of Mars that show potential artefacts on it's surface.
The truth is that we have not found the missing link between apes and humans.
The truth is that Neanderthals are extinct.
The truth is that civilisation began in the middle east not relatively far from Ararat.
The truth is that we are not certain of the origin of the moon.
The truth is that we have images of potential artefacts on the surface of the moon.
The truth is that science is lost in the onion.
You see, sometimes when you look on the ground and see a coke can, you are actually looking at a coke can.

The Hidden Passage